[English Text Version] [Versión Gráfica española] [Versión de Texto española]
 
STATE AND DISTRICTWIDE ASSESSMENTS  
 
Authorities:  20 U.S.C. §§ 1412, 1414, 6311; 34 C.F.R. Parts 200, 300; Texas Education Code;  19 T.A.C. Chapters 89, 101; 2009-2010 Texas Student Assessment Accommodations Manual, ARD Decision-Making Guide, Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills-Alternate (TAKS-Alt) Decriptors for the Participation Requirements, Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills-Modified (TAKS-M) Descriptors for the Participation Requirements
 
 
 
FEDERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS CITATIONS

P

In general, all children with disabilities are included in all general State and districtwide assessment programs, including assessments described under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), with appropriate accommodations and alternate assessments where necessary and as indicated in their respective individualized education programs (IEPs).

101.1009(b)
TEC 39.023
6311(b)(3)(C)(i)
1412(a)(16)(A)
Accommodations Manual 2009-2010


DISTRICTWIDE ASSESSMENTS


D
If the district administers any optional districtwide assessments of achievement, the admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee must provide a statement of any individualized appropriate and allowable accommodations that are necessary to measure the academic achievement and functional performance of the child on such assessment: 300.320(a)(6)(i)
89.1055(b)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(aa)
Accommodations Manual 2009-2010


P
  • The statement must be consistent with accommodation guidelines that the State or the local educational agency (LEA) developed for the provision of appropriate accommodations.
1412(a)(16)(B)
Accommodations Manual 2009-2010


D
If the ARD committee determines that the child must take an alternate assessment on a particular districtwide assessment of achievement, provide a statement of: 300.320(a)(6)(ii)
89.1055(b)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)


D
  •  Why the child cannot participate in the regular assessment; and
300.320(a)(6)(ii)(A)
89.1055(b)(1)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)


D
  •  Why the particular alternate assessment selected is appropriate for the child.
300.320(a)(6)(ii)(B)
89.1055(b)(2)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)


EARLY READING ASSESSMENTS AS PART OF THE TEXAS READING INITIATIVE




D
If the district administers an early reading assessment as part of the Texas Reading Initiative, the ARD committee must provide a statement of any individualized appropriate and allowable accommodations that are necessary to measure the academic achievement and functional performance of the child on such assessment: 300.320(a)(6)(i)
89.1055(b)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)
Accommodations Manual 2009-2010


P
  • The statement must be consistent with accommodation guidelines that the State developed for the provision of appropriate accommodations.
1412(a)(16)(B)
Accommodations Manual 2009-2010


D
If the ARD committee determines that the child must take an alternate assessment on a particular State or districtwide assessment of achievement, provide a statement of: 300.320(a)(6)(ii)
89.1055(b)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)


D
  • Why the child cannot participate in the regular assessment; and
300.320(a)(6)(ii)(A)
89.1055(b)(1)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)


D
  • Why the particular alternate assessment selected is appropriate for the child.
300.320(a)(6)(ii)(B)
89.1055(b)(2)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)


END-OF-COURSE STATEWIDE ASSESSMENTS




D
The ARD committee must provide a statement of any individualized appropriate and allowable accommodations that are necessary to measure the academic achievement and functional performance of the child on any statewide assessment: 300.320(a)(6)(i)
TEC 39.023(c)
TEC 39.023(d)
89.1055(b)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)
Accommodations Manual 2009-2010


P
  • The statement must be consistent with accommodation guidelines that the State or LEA developed for the provision of appropriate accommodations.
1412(a)(16)(A)
TEC 39.023(c)
TEC 39.023(d)
Accommodations Manual 2009-2010


D
If the ARD committee determines that the child must take an alternate assessment on a particular State or districtwide assessment of achievement, provide a statement of: 300.320(a)(6)(ii)
89.1055(b)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)


D
  • Why the child cannot participate in the regular assessment; and
300.320(a)(6)(ii)(A)
89.1055(b)(1)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)


D
  • Why the particular alternate assessment selected is appropriate for the child.
300.320(a)(6)(ii)(B)
89.1055(b)(2)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)


ASSESSMENTS TO IDENTIFY CHILDREN AS LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT (LEP)




D
The ARD committee must provide a statement of any individualized appropriate and allowable accommodations that are necessary to measure the academic achievement and functional performance of the child on any statewide assessment: 300.320(a)(6)(i)
89.1055(b)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(aa)
Accommodations Manual 2009-2010


P
  • The statement must be consistent with accommodation guidelines that the State developed for the provision of appropriate accommodations.
1412(a)(16)(B)
Accommodations Manual 2009-2010


P
For entry of a child into a bilingual education or English as a second language (ESL) program, if the tests approved by the commissioner of education would be inappropriate as part of the child's IEP, the child with a disability must be identified as limited English proficient using the following criteria: 89.1225(d)
89.1225(f)(4)


D
  • The ARD committee in conjunction with the language proficiency assessment committee (LPAC) must: 
89.1225(f)(4)


D
    • Provide a statement of why the child cannot participate in the regular assessment;
300.320(a)(6)(ii)(A)
89.1055(b)(1)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)


D
    • Determine an appropriate assessment instrument for indicating limited English proficiency;
89.1225(f)(4)


D
    • Provide a statement of why the particular alternate assessment selected is appropriate for the child; and
300.320(a)(6)(ii)(B)
89.1055(b)(2)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)


D
    • Designate the grade level and scores for indicating limited English proficiency.
89.1225(f)(4)


P
  • The ARD committee must comply with the SPECIAL FACTORS framework to determine entry into a bilingual education or ESL program.
89.1225(f)(4)


ASSESSMENT FOR EXIT OF A CHILD FROM A BILINGUAL OR ESL PROGRAM




D
The ARD committee must provide a statement of any individualized appropriate and allowable accommodations that are necessary to measure the academic achievement and functional performance of the child on any Statewide assessment: 300.320(a)(6)(i)
89.1055(b)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)
Accommodations Manual 2009-2010


P
  • The statement must be consistent with accommodation guidelines that the State developed for the provision of appropriate accommodations.
1412(a)(16)(B)
Accommodations Manual 2009-2010


P

For exit from a bilingual education to ESL program of a child with disabilities for whom the tests would be inappropriate as part of the IEP:

89.1225(h)
89.1225(k)


D
  • The ARD committee in conjunction with the LPAC must:
89.1225(h)
89.1225(k)


D
    • Provide a statement of why the child cannot participate in the regular assessment;
300.320(a)(6)(ii)(A)
89.1055(b)(1)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)


D
    • Determine an appropriate assessment instrument for exit from a bilingual education or ESL program;
89.1225(h)
89.1225(k)


D
    • Provide a statement of why the particular assessment selected is appropriate for the child; and
300.320(a)(6)(ii)(B)
89.1055(b)(2)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)


D
    • Determine the performance standard on the assessment instrument required for exit.
89.1225(h)
89.1225(k)


P
  • The ARD committee must comply with the SPECIAL FACTORS framework to determine exit from a bilingual education or ESL program.
89.1225(k)


TEXAS ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS (TAKS) STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS


P
The State must: 200.6(a)(1)
1412(a)(16)(A)
1412(a)(16)(B)


P
  • Provide for each child with a disability appropriate accommodations that the child's ARD committee determines are necessary to measure the academic achievement of the child relative to the State's academic content and academic achievement standards for the grade in which the child is enrolled.
200.1(b)(2)
200.1(b)(3)
200.1(c)
200.6(a)(1)(i)(A)
1412(a)(16)(A)
Accommodations Manual 2009-2010


P
  • Develop, disseminate information on, and promote the use of appropriate accommodations to increase the number of children with disabilities who are tested against academic achievement standards for the grade in which the child is enrolled; and
200.6(a)(1)(ii)(A)
1412(a)(16)(B)
Accommodations Manual 2009-2010


P
  • Ensure that regular and special education teachers and other appropriate staff know how to administer assessments, including making appropriate use of accommodations, for children with disabilities.
200.6(a)(1)(ii)(B)
1412(a)(16)(B)
Accommodations Manual 2009-2010


D
The ARD committee must provide a statement of any individualized appropriate and allowable accommodations that are necessary to measure the academic achievement and functional performance of the child on the assessment. 300.320(a)(6)(i)
89.1055(b)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(aa)


P
A PERSONAL GRADUATION PLAN must be developed for any middle school, junior high, or high school child who does not perform satisfactorily on a Statewide assessment.


TAKS (ACCOMMODATED) STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS




P
The State's academic assessment system must provide for one or more alternate assessments for a child with a disability whose ARD committee determines that the child cannot participate in all or part of the TAKS, even with appropriate accommodations. 200.6(a)(2)(i)
TEC 39.023(b)
Accommodations Manual 2009-2010
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P

For children with disabilities who cannot participate in the TAKS with accommodations as indicated in their respective IEPs, the State has the TAKS (Accommodated) that is aligned with the State's challenging academic content standards and challenging academic achievement standards.

200.6(a)(2)(i)
200.6(a)(2)(ii)
1412(a)(16)(C)(ii)(I)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P
The TAKS (Accommodated) yields results for the grade in which the child is enrolled. 200.6(a)(2)(ii)(A)
1412(a)(16)(C)(ii)(I)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


D
If the ARD committee determines that the child must take the TAKS (Accommodated), the child's IEP must provide a statement of: 300.320(a)(6)(ii)
89.1055(b)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


D
  • Why the child cannot participate in the regular TAKS with or without allowable accommodations; and
300.320(a)(6)(ii)(A)
89.1055(b)(1)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


D
  • Why the TAKS (Accommodated) is appropriate for the child.
300.320(a)(6)(ii)(B)
89.1055(b)(2)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P
A PERSONAL GRADUATION PLAN must be developed for any middle school, junior high, or high school child who does not perform satisfactorily on a Statewide assessment.


TAKS-MODIFIED (TAKS-M) STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS




P
The State's academic assessment system must provide for one or more alternate assessments for a child with a disability whose ARD committee determines that the child cannot participate in all or part of the TAKS, even with appropriate accommodations. 200.6(a)(2)(i)
TEC 39.023(b)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P
The State developed the TAKS-M to assess children with disabilities based on modified academic achievement standards, which: 200.6(a)(3)(i)
200.1(e)
1412(a)(16)(A)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P
  • Is aligned with the State's grade-level academic content standards;
200.6(a)(3)(ii)(A)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P
  • Yields results that measure the achievement of those children separately in reading/language arts and mathematics relative to the modified academic achievement standards;
200.6(a)(3)(ii)(B)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P
  • Meets the requirements for statewide assessments including the requirements relating to validity, reliability, and high technical quality; and
200.6(a)(3)(ii)(C)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P
  • Fits coherently in the State's overall assessment system.
200.6(a)(3)(ii)(D)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P
The State must establish and monitor implementation of clear and appropriate guidelines for ARD committees to apply in determining which children with disabilities are eligible to participate in an alternate assessment based on modified academic achievement standards using the TAKS-M. 200.1(f)(1)(i)(B)
1412(a)(16)(C)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010
TAKS-M Descriptors


P
Children eligible to be assessed using the TAKS-M may be from any of the disability categories listed in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). 200.1(f)(1)(ii)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P
The LEA must inform parents of children selected to be assessed with the TAKS-M under the State's guidelines that their child's achievement will be measured based on modified academic achievement standards. 200.1(f)(1)(iv)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P

Children receiving special education services who have a disability that significantly affects academic progress in the grade-level curriculum and precludes the achievement of grade-level proficiency within a school year will be assessed with TAKS-M if they meet all of the participation criteria established by the State.

200.1(e)(2)
1412(a)(16)(A)
Participation Requirements for TAKS–M


D
If the ARD committee determines that the child must take the TAKS-M, the child's IEP must provide a statement of: 300.320(a)(6)(ii)
89.1055(b)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


D
  • Why the child cannot participate in the regular TAKS with or without allowable accommodations; and
300.320(a)(6)(ii)(A)
89.1055(b)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


D
  • Why the TAKS-M is appropriate for the child, including that the following criteria were met:
300.320(a)(6)(ii)(B)
89.1055(b)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


D
    • The child needs extensive modifications and accommodations to classroom instruction, assignments, and assessments to access and demonstrate progress in the grade-level Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS);
200.1(e)(2)
1412(a)(16)(A)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010
TAKS-M Descriptors


D
    • The child demonstrates academic progress in such a way that even if significant growth occurs during the school year, the ARD committee is reasonably certain that the child will not achieve grade-level proficiency as demonstrated by multiple valid measures of evidence;
200.1(e)(2)
1412(a)(16)(A)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010
TAKS-M Descriptors


D
    • The child meets some but not all of the participation criteria of TAKS-Alt; and
200.1(e)(2)
1412(a)(16)(A)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010
TAKS-M Descriptors


D
    • The child requires an alternate form of TAKS which is more closely aligned with instructional modifications in order to demonstrate knowledge of the grade-level TEKS.
200.1(e)(2)
1412(a)(16)(A)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010
TAKS-M Descriptors


P
A PERSONAL GRADUATION PLAN must be developed for any middle school, junior high, or high school child who does not perform satisfactorily on a Statewide assessment.


TAKS-ALTERNATE (TAKS-ALT) STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS


P
The State's academic assessment system must provide for one or more alternate assessments for a child with a disability whose ARD committee determines that the child cannot participate in all or part of the TAKS, even with appropriate accommodations. 200.6(a)(2)(i)
TEC 39.023(b)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P
For children with the most significant cognitive disabilities, the State defined, through a documented and validated standards-setting process, alternate academic achievement standards that meet the following criteria:    200.1(d)
1412(a)(16)(C)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010
TAKS-Alt Descriptors


P
  • Are aligned with the State's academic content standards;
200.1(d)(1)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P
  • Promote access to the general curriculum; and
200.1(d)(2)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P
  • Reflect professional judgment of the highest achievement standards possible.
200.1(d)(3)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P
The State developed the TAKS-Alt to assess children with the most significant cognitive disabilities based on alternate achievement standards. 1412(a)(16)(A)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P
The State must establish and monitor implementation of clear and appropriate guidelines for ARD committees to apply in determining children with the most significant cognitive disabilities who will be assessed on alternate academic achievement standards using the TAKS-Alt. 200.1(f)(1)(i)(A)
1412(a)(16)(C)(ii)(II)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P
Children eligible to be assessed using the TAKS-Alt may be from any of the disability categories listed in the IDEA. 200.1(f)(1)(ii)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P
The LEA must inform parents of children selected to be assessed with TAKS-Alt under the State's guidelines that their child's achievement will be measured based on alternate achievement standards.
200.1(f)(1)(iv)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


P

Children receiving special education services who have the most significant cognitive disabilities and are unable to participate in the other statewide assessments even with substantial accommodations and/or modifications will be assessed with TAKS-Alt if the State's participation criteria are met.

200.1(d)
1412(a)(16)(C)


D
If the ARD committee determines that the child must take the TAKS-Alt, provide a statement of: 300.320(a)(6)(ii)
89.1055(b)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


D
  • Why the child cannot participate in the regular TAKS with or without allowable accommodations; and
300.320(a)(6)(ii)(A)
89.1055(b)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


D
  • Why the TAKS-Alt is appropriate for the child, including that the following criteria were met:
300.320(a)(6)(ii)(B)
89.1055(b)
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010


D
    • The child requires supports to access the general curriculum that may include assistance involving communication, response style, physical access, or daily living skills;
200.1(d)
1412(a)(16)(C)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010
TAKS-Alt Descriptors


D
    • The child requires direct, intensive, individualized instruction in a variety of settings to accomplish the acquisition, maintenance and generalization of skills;
200.1(d)
1412(a)(16)(C)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010
TAKS-Alt Descriptors


D
    • The child accesses and participates in the grade-level TEKS through activities that focus on prerequisite skills;
200.1(d)
1412(a)(16)(C)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010
TAKS-Alt Descriptors


D
    • The child demonstrates knowledge and skills routinely in class by methods other than paper-and-pencil tasks; and
200.1(d)
1412(a)(16)(C)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010
TAKS-Alt Descriptors


D
    • The child demonstrates performance objectives that may include real-life applications of the grade-level TEKS as appropriate to the child's abilities and needs.
200.1(d)
1412(a)(16)(C)
ARD Decision-Making Guide 2009-2010
TAKS-Alt Descriptors


P
A PERSONAL GRADUATION PLAN must be developed for any middle school, junior high, or high school child who does not perform satisfactorily on a Statewide assessment.


STUDENT SUCCESS INITIATIVE




P

For a child who does not perform satisfactorily on the TAKS, TAKS (Accommodated), TAKS-M, or TAKS-Alt, the LEA must comply with the requirements of the STUDENT SUCCESS INITIATIVE framework.



 
 
Last Updated: Tuesday, October 27, 2009
  | HOME | CONTACT US |